Signals or not?
Realytica has a policy to not offer signals, simply by what offering such signals would demand.
Offering signals on a wide unknown user base introduces so many variables it becomes impossible to cover all of them honestly.
And it also mandates the one offering them having the complete picture of what matters. To everyone…
That´s a stark claim…
What would it demand?
Theoretically and mathematically a lot of unknowns. Unknowns that´s vital to open a position.
Risk
The risk tolerance isn´t a global one, which invalidate the opportunity to call where the stop loss is for a signal. Some people gladly jump out of planes wearing a parachute, while some sees the same thing as reckless.
Approach to trading
One trader looks for opportunities playing out over weeks, months or longer. Another trader seeks short and quick opportunities lasting under a hour. Which carries completely different strategic approach to the same thing.
Capital base
Capital base will either enable or disable opportunities to use “safety net tools”. And there´s no global capital base we can use for position management.
Timeframe
A signal can be correct in one timeframe, but not even exist in another. And it´s unlikely that there´s a global timeframe.
And strictly speaking the difficult part of trading isn´t opening a position.
It´s managing it…
Signals are tricky to offer broadly by design.
Realytica will offer tools though that makes the reading of price movements less complex. But what those readings means to you, is entirely yours no one else´s. Your math, risk, trading style and most importantly your capital.
Realytica isn´t here to tell you what to do, but offer tools and knowledge that hopefully makes traders more aware of the territory they´re in.
The goal has always been the same, more self propelled traders.
Offering signals would cancel that idea…
